Can citizens say 'no'?: Tracking civil society's impact in Parliament

Authors

  • Nazeema Mohamed Institute for African Alternatives (IFAA)
  • Bruce Kadalie Institute for African Alternatives (IFAA)
  • Rachael Nyirongo Institute for African Alternatives (IFAA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14426/na.v97i1.2892

Keywords:

South Africa, Democratic framework, Constitution, Citizen involvement, Parliament, Civil society participation, Participatory democracy, Democracy

Abstract

Active citizen involvement, a foundational element of South Africa's democratic framework, aims to ensure that all voices, especially those historically on the margins, are acknowledged and actively incorporated into policy decision-making. Yet this fine principle, clearly stipulated in the Constitution, encounters a fundamental contradiction when it comes up against the challenges of implementation.
In reality, South Africa’s organised civil society today, itself the product of an powerful history of community-based resistance that overcame apartheid, is impeded from fulfilling this constitutional duty by severe shortages of capacity and resources. It is trapped in a tangle of bureaucratic inefficiencies, fragmented government coordination and limited public engagement and awareness.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

27-06-2025

How to Cite

Mohamed, N., Kadalie, B., & Nyirongo, R. (2025). Can citizens say ’no’?: Tracking civil society’s impact in Parliament. New Agenda: South African Journal of Social and Economic Policy, 97(1). https://doi.org/10.14426/na.v97i1.2892